<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Pull-Request on Mark Allison</title>
    <link>https://markallison.co.uk/tags/pull-request/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Pull-Request on Mark Allison</description>
    
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.151.2</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 10:58:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://markallison.co.uk/tags/pull-request/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Submit PRs</title>
      <link>https://markallison.co.uk/blog/submit-prs/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2021 10:58:39 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://markallison.co.uk/blog/submit-prs/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;found-an-error-in-microsoft-documentation&#34;&gt;Found an error in Microsoft documentation?&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Submit a pull request!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Much of the Microsoft documentation is open source on GitHub which means that if you spot an error in either the code examples, the grammar, spelling, a typo or copy-and-paste error, you can quickly fix it and people reading the docs after you will benefit. This is such a difference from when I started using Microsoft products back in the 90s where nothing was open source and all documentation was either in a printed manual or a &lt;a href=&#34;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Compiled_HTML_Help&#34;&gt;chm file&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
